Is Bottled Water a Detriment to Healthy Teeth

Seventy percent of parents say that their children drink bottled water. Though this water may be “pure,” it is often lacking one vital component–fluoride–which experts say may result in an increase of dental decay Ultrasonic Scaler. Even bottled water that does contain fluoride often has a concentration of .3 ppm, which is less than half of the recommended level. In the article, Dr Burton Edelstein, president of the Children’s Dental Health Project notes that:

“Fluoride — no matter how it gets to the tooth surfaces — toothpaste, water, rinses, varnishes, gels, is effective in a multitude of ways,” he said. “It strengthens the tooth structure while also inhibiting the bacteria’s capacity to produce acids from sugars. It is most effective when delivered multiple times throughout the day, by using fluoridated toothpastes twice daily and by drinking fluoridated water.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) calls water fluoridation one of the “10 great public health achievements of the 20th century,” and it is imperative that everyone has the opportunity to benefit from it portable dental unit. For additional information about how fluoride works to protect teeth,

Poor Oral Health Leads to a Harder Time in School

A new study conducted by the Ostrow School of Dentistry at USC highlighted even more clearly how important good oral health is by showing the connection between dental problems and school problems. The study found that not only are children who recently reported tooth pain more likely to have a GPA below a 2.8, but also that students miss, on average, two school days a year for dental issues, often resulting in their parents having to take time off work. Students who come from socioeconomically disadvantaged families have an even greater risk—over 70% had dental caries, and these children were nearly three times as likely to miss school due to poor oral health.

Tooth Decay 101 – How Cavities Form

Have you ever wondered just how a cavity is caused? A Florida article breaks down the science behind it, and details just how the tooth decay begins and progresses micro motor. Knowing how cavities are caused also puts people at an advantage for figuring out how to avoid them.

The article points out that, for example, bacteria that cause cavities can be spread from person to person; if parents limit the amount of foods and beverages with added-sugar that feed those cavity-causing bacteria, they are helping to protect their child from painful decay down the road.

The Cancer Claim

Anti-fluoride activists frequently claim that fluoride is linked to cancer, but the past few years have provided growing evidence that there is no credible link between the two. Earlier this week, Irish health officials strengthened the case against such a link. The National Cancer Registry of Ireland publicly criticized an anti-fluoride group for using the Registry’s cancer atlas to misrepresent disease patterns in different areas.Do You Take Medications? for more information.

The atlas maps cancer patterns in different areas of the country. The National Cancer Registry said the map has been “erroneously used by anti-fluoridation groups to suggest a link between water fluoridation and cancer.” The Registry added, “We do not consider that water fluoridation is a plausible explanation for the patterns shown.”

Fluoridation opponents had tried to contrast cancer rates in Ireland with those in Northern Ireland, which borders Ireland but is a part of the United Kingdom. The Registry explained why the efforts of the anti-fluoride group were misguided. “Although the bulk of the population in the Republic of Ireland lives in cities and large towns, where the water is fluoridated, most of the area shown on the map is sparsely populated and without fluoridated water supplies, so water fluoridation cannot be suggested as an explanation for the (cancer) patterns seen.”

Roughly 70% of Ireland is fluoridated; this figure is slightly below the U.S.’s 74% rate.

In the past few years, several U.S micro motor. studies or reports have determined that fluoride does not cause cancer. One of these was a Harvard study whose design was approved by the National Cancer Institute. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also reached the conclusion that fluoride does not cause cancer. California has a long list of items that require warnings to be posted if a cancer-causing product is used or sold by a business, and an expert panel in the state reviewed the research on fluoride and decided that the evidence did not justify adding fluoride to this list mobile dental unit.

Researchers Find Link Between Obesity and Tooth Decay Among Homeless Children

Case Western Reserve University and University of Akron researchers examined the connection between obesity, oral health and socioeconomic status dental air compressor. According to researchers, “as body mass index increase with age, so do the number of cavities.” Tooth decay is the leading disease in children today. Marguerite Di Marco, a pediatric nurse practitioner, states, “poverty contributes to poor dental health by limiting access to nutritious foods, refrigerators to preserve food and even running water.”

Tooth decay can also lead to other “chronic infections in children.” Water fluoridation can help in these poverty stricken areas, where there is little to no access to dental care.

A Grinchy Paul Connett

Paul Connett, the firebrand leader of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), must be looking forward to the year 2013 because December has been a very frustrating month for him. First, he sent an angry letter to a newspaper reporter in Syracuse, NY who wrote an article that he didn’t like. Here are some of the facts included by reporter Marnie Eisenstadt that may have raised Connett’s wrath:

He often relies on studies of fluoride use in other countries, where concentrations are significantly higher dental implant machine. One of Connett’s main assertions, that fluoride is a dangerous, unregulated industrial waste byproduct, is disputed by public health professionals and was examined by, which found the assertion false.

The reporter’s statements were true, of course, and nowhere in Connett’s letter does he even try to dispute them. PolitiFact is an independent fact-checking service, so this conclusion speaks volumes about the lengths that Connett and other fluoride opponents will go in their fear-mongering campaign.

Later this month, Connett appealed to fellow anti-fluoride activists for money to fund his relentless campaign against water fluoridation. In his appeal, Connett was surprisingly gloomy about recent news and trends. He began by sharing the “bad news” that a water board in Santa Clara County, Calif vacuum forming machine dental. (San Jose) had recently voted to begin the process of water fluoridation. Until this vote, San Jose had been the largest U.S. city without fluoridated water. Connett also recounted other FAN setbacks over the past 15 years, including the decisions by Los Angeles and San Diego to proceed with fluoridation.

Connett wrote that state fluoridation laws (like the one in California) are “the kiss of death for local democracy,” but this hysterical claim ignores the fact that the water board in San Jose held multiple public hearings and conducted a series of votes before deciding to fluoridate its water system Ultrasonic Scaler. It’s just another Connett claim that doesn’t stand up to the evidence.

Five days before the end of the year, Connett also complained that FAN was “only a quarter of the way to our goal of 1000 donors, by midnight Dec 31.” As the number of Americans receiving fluoridated water steadily grows, Connett appears to become more frustrated — and desperate.

Remembering Dr C. Everett Koop

Dr C. Everett Koop, the U.S. Surgeon General who died on Monday, is fondly remembered by millions of Americans dental supplies. He was the 13th Surgeon General, serving from 1982 to 1989. The Philadelphia Inquirer eulogized Dr Koop by calling him “a courageous and brilliant pediatric surgeon.” A Washington Post columnist wrote of Dr Koop that he was “the only memorable surgeon general.”

Perhaps that’s unfair to others who have also served with distinction in this role, but there’s no question that Dr Koop will be remembered as a pioneer. For example, at a time when many Americans had misconceptions about what caused AIDS and what precautions could be taken, Dr Koop took the then-controversial step of approving a plan to mail AIDS information to every U.S. household. “We are fighting disease, not people,” Dr Koop stated then.

Oral health advocates will fondly remember Dr Koop as someone who recognized the importance of prevention. He was a strong supporter of community water fluoridation, and this is what he said about the topic:

Fluoridation is the single most important commitment a community can make to the oral health of its children and to future generations dental vibrator.

Brooksville, Florida – 78 Seconds of “Debate”

Believe it or not, 78 seconds was the total length of discussion that preceded the recent decision by a city council in Florida to end community water fluoridation. In an editorial, the Tampa Bay Times writes that the Brooksville City Council “should be ashamed for ducking a debate on an imperative public health issue.” According to the editorial:

Nearly two hours and 40 minutes into a public hearing on the Brooksville city budget 16 months ago, council member Lara Bradburn expounded on the need for a “diligent discussion” on paying for improved roads. And, while she had the floor, she followed up with a motion — to eliminate $6,000 for adding fluoride to the municipal water system.

The entire debate, from motion to explanation to unanimous vote, took 78 seconds. … Bradburn’s end-run — overturning a 2008 council decision maintaining fluoride additives to the city water — came with no advance notice on the agenda, no documentation to council members, no input from the public and no notification afterward to dentists or health officials.

… It’s a sham. Bradburn should be embarrassed for championing this lack of transparency. Her explanation now is that it was a prudent cost-savings and the matter had been thoroughly dissected three years earlier micro motors australia.

… The fluoride money was in an enterprise fund that does not affect the property tax rate. … If Bradburn wants to look out for her constituents’ pocketbooks — cutting out fluoride did not result in a rate decrease for water customers — perhaps she and the council should consider research from the Centers for Disease Control and the University of Georgia. It calculated the annual per-person cost savings in fluoridated communities the size of Brooksville to be $16.

Pulitzer Prize-winning science writer

The anti-fluoride group Clean Water Portland cited “a National Science Foundation study from June 2012 that showed that 43 percent of ‘fluoride products’ contain trace elements of arsenic, 2 percent contain similar proportions of lead, and 2 percent copper. However, what Clean Water Portland does not say is that the report finds that the amounts of heavy metals found in these samples are so minuscule as to be completely innocuous; none come remotely close to the EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Levels. Similar flaws can be found with Clean Water Portland’s analysis of many of the studies that supposedly support their cause.”

– Slate

“… the anti-fluoride crowd took science to task and decided it knew better than the majority of experts who say that fluoridated water is beneficial for communities and has been a raging success. … For some, fluoride in water is the only preventive dental care ever received. By shooting down the city’s plan, voters missed the opportunity to cost-effectively help the underprivileged, decrease overall dental costs and improve health outcomes.”

– Elizabeth Hovde, columnist for The Oregonian

“… I’m hard pressed to find [Portland opponents] referring to anything but ‘fluoridation chemicals’ rather that fluoride or fluoridation dental lab equipment. It’s repeated so often that it’s jarring to me and clearly meant to play on people’s fear of chemicals rather than on reason or evidence. … the antifluoride forces were playing on the public’s fear of chemicals and misunderstanding of chemistry to make fluoridation seem a lot more scary than it is tooth scaler australia. (Actually, it’s not scary at all.) As always, the dose makes the poison, and the levels used in municipal water supplies have a long history of safety.”

– ScienceBlogs

“Fluoride opponents in Portland frequently suggested the city’s healthcare system should just be ‘fixed’ so that everyone gets perfect and equal dental care, rendering fluoride unnecessary micro motors australia. This would be great, but it’s a world that will never exist. That large numbers of Portlanders apparently believe a widely-accepted public health measure to fill in the gaps of our imperfect healthcare system is a horrific affront to personal liberty says a lot about the city’s disconnect from the real world …”

– Gawker

Sifting Through Information to Get the Facts

More and more people are turning to the Internet to answer questions related to their health. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 72% of people who use the Internet say they went online to obtain health information. As this trend continues, so do opportunities to encounter information that may be damaging. Sadly, there are people taking advantage of this medium, using the Internet to spread fear by talking about beliefs that are not based in fact—while using scientific sounding arguments contra angle handpiece.

The tactics these activists use are easy to detect and simple to apply. Take a look at the Internet hoax about dihydrogen monoxide (DHMO). The authors warn that DHMO can cause tissue damage, is a major component of acid rain, and is found in biopsies of pre-cancerous tumors and lesions—not to mention causing many other health problems scian nebulizer. They state that “DHMO is a constituent of many known toxic substances, diseases and disease-causing agents, environmental hazards and can even be lethal to humans in quantities as small as a thimbleful.”

Sounds scary, right? Of course, DHMO is more commonly known as water implant machine! Fortunately, this Web site was meant to be a humorous take on the tactics these anti-science activists use to scare people about things that are actually good for us.

Unfortunately, there is nothing funny about misleading people about their health. Misinformation scares people, and can even have deadly impacts. That is why having the endorsement and support of trusted organizations is crucial. Water fluoridation is one of the most studied public health practices, and leading health and medical authorities including the Centers for Disease Control, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Dental Association support it. Finding information is easy, but determining the accuracy of it can be tough. Check out our list of leading health and medical organizations and their endorsements of fluoride.

Bottled Water and Your Children’s Teeth

Do your children drink bottled water instead of tap water? Then their teeth could be paying the price. Here is why. Fluoride is a mineral found in nearly all water supplies but usually at a level too low to prevent tooth decay. That’s why so many communities add a little more fluoride to drinking water. This process is called “fluoridation” and it raises fluoride to the level proven to prevent or even reverse tooth decay.

Unfortunately, many types of bottled water do not have enough fluoride to prevent cavities. If you purchase bottled water, you are spending more money and your children’s teeth probably are not getting the benefits of fluoride. The leading health and medical organizations endorse fluoridation as safe and effective for reducing tooth decay. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), fluoridation is so effective because it provides teeth “with frequent contact with low levels of fluoride throughout each day and throughout life.”

Brushing regularly is important. But drinking tap water that is fluoridated provides additional protection dental lab supplies australia. You can find more information about water fluoridation on the Campaign for Dental Health’s Fluoridation Questions page. This CDC Web page can help you confirm whether your local water supply is fluoridated.

The ABC’s of Brushing Teeth

Brushing teeth regularly is the foundation of good dental health. Get your children into the habit of brushing twice a day for at least two minutes. This fun video teaches children how to brush their teeth properly dental equipment. Children ages 2-6 should use a pea-sized dab of fluoride toothpaste. Teach them to spit out the toothpaste once they are done so they don’t swallow it. For kids below the age of 2, just use a soft toothbrush and a little bit of water (but no toothpaste) dental handpiece. This 2min2x Web site has helpful tips and information for how kids can protect their teeth as they grow up.

Four Codes that are Costing You Money

As dental benefits shift to PPOs and reimbursement rates continue to shrink, many offices are struggling with increasing overhead and decreasing cash flow and profit margins. Coding correctly is critical for maximizing reimbursement, increasing cash flow, and minimizing errors that could result in fines or worse. A thorough coding review should be conducted each year. Here are four places to start dental lab equipment.

Fluoride Codes D1208 and D1206
Fluoride codes D1203 and D1204 for child and adult fluoride treatments were replaced with code D1208, which is used for child and adult applications. Many offices reporting the old codes are, most likely, not being reimbursed for the procedures.Restrictions to the fluoride varnish code D1206, which limited it to patients with moderate to high caries risk, have been eliminated. D1206 is applicable for child and adult reporting and pays a higher UCR than D1208.

D0140: Limited Oral Evaluation – Problem Focused or D9110 Palliative (Emergency) Treatment of Dental Pain
D9110 is an under-utilized code Ultrasonic Scaler. Overwhelmingly, offices code D0140 for emergency visits when treating a patient for pain or discomfort. D0140 is an evaluation code and limited to “one evaluation per six months” or “two evaluations per year” rule. Consider reporting D9110 for minor non-definitive procedures to reduce discomfort, sensitivity, or pain at an emergency visit. D9110 is a procedure code and will not use one of the exam limitations. This palliative code pays a higher UCR than D0140. When reporting D9110, include the required narrative dental supplies. Palliative D9110 should not be used in conjunction with a definitive procedure.

D0180: Comprehensive Periodontal Evaluation– New or Established Patient
This evaluation code may be reported for established periodontal patients, patients showing signs or symptoms of periodontal disease, and for patients with risk factors such as smoking and diabetes. D0180 requires a complete and detailed periodontal evaluation, including full-mouth probing and detailed charting. D0180 may be reported at the same visit as a D4910. However, it may be downgraded to a D0120 fee. Do not report D0180 in addition to a D0150 comprehensive evaluation. D0180 usually pays a slightly higher UCR than D0150.

D1352: Preventative Resin Restoration in a Moderate to High Caries Risk Patient– Permanent Tooth
D1352 is a conservative restoration of an active cavitated lesion in a pit or fissure that does not extend into dentin, and includes placement of a sealant in any radiating noncarious fissures or pits. Do not report this preventive type resin restoration if the prep and decay extend into dentin. See D2391 for one-surface composite. Do not report this preventative restoration if there is no active decay in the enamel. See D1351 for sealant. Do not report D1352 for a primary tooth. According to Dr. Charles Blair, some plans will pay more than two times the fee for a sealant but less than a one-surface composite and some plans will pay the alternate sealant benefit.

Digital Technology Delivers Excellence in Same-Day Restorations

Once considered a niche service, in-office milling is now a familiar concept for practitioners, as the ability to effectively restore patients’ teeth in just one simple office visit represents the most efficient means of restoring straightforward, single-unit posterior cases. With the adoption rate of digital impression technology continuing to climb, the introduction of lower cost and open-architecture digital impression scanners and milling units is allowing dentists to more readily implement a digital workflow into their practice Dental Chair.

“In the past, typical milling blocks required a two-step, technique-sensitive baking process. However, more recent advances have introduced milling blocks (BruxZir NOW, manufactured by Glidewell Dental) that are made from high-strength post-sintered solid zirconia and require no staining or glazing,” says Dr. Patel. When used with an in-office mill, restorations can be designed and fabricated in about an hour, then delivered to the patient immediately, affording valuable time savings for doctors and patients alike.

Milling Specifics
In-office milling is ideally indicated for single-unit posterior cases, such as molar and premolar crowns dental file. To get started, clinicians prepare the tooth and scan the preparation with an intraoral scanning device. The scanned image is transmitted to a dedicated computer workstation that is connected to the chairside mill. After a simple setup, the software quickly and accurately proposes crown designs based on the tooth being restored; the multitude of crown design tools require little effort to master.

Next, the doctor-approved design information is sent to the onsite mill where the clinician inserts the milling block and bur. At that point, the patient may step into the waiting room, opening up the chair for the next appointment.

After milling is complete, the crown is removed from the machine. The clinician uses a high-speed diamond or carbonium disc to cut the sprue, and user-friendly polishing tools aid in achieving a highly esthetic luster.

The crown is then tried in. The occlusion and contacts may be adjusted; however, no adjustments, or very minimal ones, are typically required. After fit verification, the restoration is cemented to the tooth. The final delivery is straightforward and can be performed with ease.

“In my opinion, cutting-edge technology has made it seamless to implement an in-office delivery system. Crowns can be designed, milled, and readied for placement in about an hour with equipment such as the TS150 mill, manufactured by Glidewell Dental,” says Dr. Patel. While clinicians have successfully outsourced zirconia crowns to the lab in the past, performing the procedure chairside, on demand, allows for ultimate control over the case dental instruments.

Using the Wrong Tech Can Put Your Dental Practice at Risk

Our guest blogger today is Donovan Gregg

As a dentist, you need to stay focused on keeping your patients healthy. You don’t have time to also be an expert on the IT infrastructure that enables your practice to run smoothly. What you do need is a competent partner to take the IT pain out of being a dentist, freeing you up to do what you do best.

Using the right tech is important when it comes to protecting patient records. If you don’t use up-to-date versions of hardware and software, you potentially risk losing valuable data or exposing your patients’ protected health information (PHI), which could result in financial damage from large fines and lost revenue micro motors australia. And just because something is current doesn’t mean it’s right or the best fit. Many dental practices use wrong or incomplete technology.

It’s Time for a Tech Inventory
Do you know how to identify a potential liability or weakness in your system? How do you know when it’s time to upgrade? Here are three things dental business owners should consider:

Hardware Failure Risks – Any appliance with a lot of parts will need maintenance. Workstation and server hard drives have many components, making them some of the most likely points of failure. When you use outdated hardware, you run the risk of losing all your practice data, including patient and financial records dental air compressor.
Software Security Risks – Data breaches may expose patient records and threaten your practice’s reputation. It’s critical to stay on top of security updates, since the longer your operating system has been on the market, the more time hackers have had to figure out how to exploit vulnerabilities.
Additionally, there comes a point when a manufacturer will discontinue support. When that happens, your valuable data may be vulnerable to security breaches. You need to upgrade any unsupported software to continue to protect yourself, your practice, and your PHI. It’s too risky to put off.

A Trusted IT Partner – Although you may be tech savvy, your true expertise is in the dental services that you offer. You need a partner to provide the expert support for the business hardware and software your practice depends on. Henry Schein TechCentral has been working with dental and healthcare networks of all sizes for more than 20 years.
The technology professionals at Henry Schein TechCentral can help identify your business’s weak areas, so you can get the equipment that fits the current and future needs of your practice portable dental unit. TechCentral is offering a no-obligation network assessment to help you understand your unique needs, with a thorough evaluation of networks, servers, routers, and switches; backup and recovery systems; security threat protection; clinical business computers and wireless/Wi-Fi security.

Don’t put your precious PHI at risk by using the wrong tech. Don’t depend on the local IT guy who knows nothing about the dental space when you can depend on a trusted IT organization with proven solutions designed specifically for the dental industry.